MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979072571 · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.10.6886

Hormonal Regulation of Estrogen Receptor α and β Gene Expression in Human Granulosa-Luteal Cells in Vitro1

2000· article· en· W1979072571 on OpenAlexaff
C.-C. Chiang, Kwai Wa Cheng, S Igarashi, Parimal S. Nathwani, Peter C. K. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineEstrogen receptorEstrogenEstrogen receptor alphaFulvestrantEstrogen receptor betaForskolinMessenger RNABiologyChemistryMedicineGeneStimulationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estrogen is one of the major sex steroid hormones that is produced from the human ovary, and its actions are established to be a receptor-mediated process. Despite the demonstration of estrogen receptor (ER) expression, little is known regarding the regulation of ER in the human ovary. In the present study we investigated the expression and hormonal regulation of ERalpha and ERbeta in human granulosa-luteal cells (hGLCs). Using RT-PCR amplification, both ERalpha and ERbeta messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) were detected from hGLCs. Northern blot analysis revealed that ERalpha is expressed at a relatively lower level than ERbeta. Basal expression studies indicated that ERalpha mRNA levels remain unchanged, whereas ERbeta mRNA levels increased with time in culture in vitro, suggesting that ERbeta is likely to play a dynamic role in mediating estrogen action in hGLCs. The regulation of ERalpha and ERbeta expression by hCG was examined. hCG treatment (10 IU/mL) significantly attenuated the ERalpha (45%; P < 0.01) and ERbeta (40%; P < 0.01) mRNA levels. The hCG-induced decrease in ERalpha and ERbeta expression was mimicked by 8-bromo-cAMP (1 mmol/L) and forskolin (10 micromol/L) treatment. Additional studies using a specific protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor (adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate, Rp-isomer, triethylammonium salt) and an adenylate cyclase inhibitor (SQ 22536) further implicated the involvement of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in hCG action in these cells. The hCG-induced decrease in ERalpha and ERbeta mRNA levels was prevented in the presence of these inhibitors. Next, the effect of GnRH on ER expression was studied. Sixty-eight percent (P < 0.001) and 60% (P < 0.001) decreases in ERalpha and ERbeta mRNA levels, respectively, were observed after treatment with 0.1 micromol/L GnRH agonist (GnRHa). Pretreatment of the cells with a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor (GF109203X) completely reversed the GnRHa-induced down-regulation of ERalpha and ERbeta expression, suggesting the involvement of PKC in GnRH signal transduction in hGLCs. In agreement with the semiquantitative RT-PCR results, Western blot analysis detected a decrease in ERalpha and ERbeta proteins levels in hGLCs after treatment with hCG (10 IU/mL), GnRH (0.1 micromol/L), 8-bromo-cAMP (1 mmol/L), forskolin (10 micromol/L), or phorbol 12-myristate 13 acetate (10 micromol/L). Functionally, we demonstrated an inhibition of progesterone production in hGLCs in vitro by 17beta-estradiol, and this inhibitory effect was eliminated by pretreatment of 10 IU/mL hCG or 0.1 micromol/L GnRHa for 24 h before 17beta-estradiol administration. In summary, we observed a differential expression of ERalpha and ERbeta mRNA in hGLCs in vitro. The demonstration of hCG- and GnRHa-induced down-regulation of ERalpha and ERbeta gene expression suggests that hCG and GnRH may contribute to the control of granulosa-luteal cell function. Furthermore, our data suggest that the effects of hCG and GnRH on ERalpha and ERbeta expression in hGLCs are mediated in part by activation of PKA and PKC signaling pathways, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207