MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979072890 · doi:10.1115/detc2013-12496

Design of Isotropic Accelerometer Strapdowns for Rigid-Body Pose-and-Twist Estimation

2013· article· en· W1979072890 on OpenAlexaff
Ting Zou, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentripetal forceAccelerometerAccelerationRigid bodyIsotropyTwistPoseControl theory (sociology)KinematicsPoint (geometry)Computer scienceCoupling (piping)PhysicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsComputer visionEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeometryOpticsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coupling of tangential and centripetal acceleration components occurs in the estimation of rigid-body pose and twist with current accelerometer strapdowns. To address this shortcoming and its pernicious effects, a novel design of biaxial accelerometer strapdown is proposed. By virtue of its inherent isotropy, point tangential acceleration is decoupled from its centripetal counterpart, thereby realizing a straightforward and accurate acceleration estimation. The algorithm associated with the strapdown is validated by means of a numerical example, which shows the precision of the strapdown in estimating rigid-body pose and twist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207