Russian mutational spectrum differs from that of their Western counterparts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been previously noted that the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) mutant frequency of Russian subjects is significantly higher than age-matched Western counterparts. To further explore this difference, approximately 100 mutants collected from Russian twins reported in a previous study have been sequenced and compared to an aged-matched Western mutant dataset. The mutational spectrum of the Russian subjects was significantly different (Adams and Skopek Monte Carlo test, P = 0. 004). Curiously, this younger Russian spectrum resembles that recovered from older individuals in the West. Specifically, A:T-->C:G transversions are significantly over-represented (Fisher's Exact test, P = 0.003) in the twin spectrum as compared to the young (age </= 35) Western spectrum. Even more noteworthy is the observation that 42% (23/55) of the base substitutions, almost double the expected value, have not been previously reported. These observations lead to the conclusion that this group of young Russian subjects has a mutational pattern which is distinct from the pattern of mutation observed in Western counterparts. The origin of this difference, whether related to genotoxic challenge, repair, or avoidance, cannot be distinguished, but diet and other lifestyle factors clearly may be responsible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".