MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979139106 · doi:10.3917/ling.372.0135

Histoire d'une traduction : Funeral Blues de W. H. Auden

2002· article· en· W1979139106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLa linguistique · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluesPoetryStylisticsTerminologyLiteratureSelection (genetic algorithm)ArtPhilosophyLinguisticsArt historyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RéSUMé The article presented here recounts the different stages of a functionalist translation of the W. H. Auden poem, Funeral Blues. The first part relates to the selection and justification of the methodology chosen by the group. Next, is a summary of the analysis of the original poem, including stylistics and terminology. The third part is devoted to the development of the translation, its various obstacles, including some examples of proposed translations in view of the " definitive " French version of the poem 1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it