MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979151040 · doi:10.1517/14712598.2.1.75

The efficacy of genetic vaccination is dependent upon the nature of the vector system and antigen

2002· review· en· W1979151040 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan L. Bramson, Yonghong Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Biological Therapy · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemAntigenVacciniaBiologyVaccinationImmunologyVirologyVector (molecular biology)Viral vectorVirusImmunogenicityDNA vaccinationImmunizationGeneticsGeneRecombinant DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetic immunisation is emerging as a safe and specific means of eliciting prophylactic and therapeutic immune responses. Just as the immune response to various infectious agents will differ based on the aetiology of the infection and nature of antigenic determinants, so does the immune response following genetic immunisation. This review will discuss the impact of vector selection and antigen structure on genetic immunisation. Comparative analyses of plasmid DNA (pDNA), adenovirus (Ad) and vaccinia virus vaccines have demonstrated that each vector system is associated with a unique outcome following immunisation. Similarly, re-targeting cytosolic protein to different cellular compartments can dramatically affect the subsequent immune response. Thus, to design an effective genetic vaccine, one must consider both the biology of the vaccine vector/antigen combination and the biology of the pathogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Biological TherapySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207