MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979155760 · doi:10.2514/2.1966

Effect of Geometrical Parameters on the Mixing Performance of Cantilevered Ramp Injectors

2003· article· en· W1979155760 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Parent, J. P. Sislian

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsMaterials scienceMach numberInjectorLigand cone angleMixing (physics)Penetration (warfare)Expansion tunnelPropellantAngle of attackSupersonic speedHypersonic speedAerospace engineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsConical surfaceComposite materialAerodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cantilevered ramp fuel-injection strategy is considered as a means to deliver rapid mixing for use in scramjets and shock-induced combustion ramjets (shcramjets). The primary objective is to perform parametric studies of the injector array spacing, injection angle, and sweeping angle at a convective Mach number of 1.5. Analysis of the three-dimensional steady-state hypersonic e owe elds is accomplished through the WARP code, using the Yee‐Roe e ux-limiting scheme and theWilcox k-! turbulencemodel, along with the Wilcox dilatational dissipation correction. A closer array spacing is shown to increase signie cantly the mixing efe ciency in the near e eld, and a direct relationship between initial fuel/air contact surface and mixing efe ciency growth is apparent. A change in the injector angle from 4 to 16 deg induces a 9% augmentation in the mixing efe ciency but more than a twofold increase in the thrust potential losses. A sweeping angle of i3.5 deg is observed to result into signie cantly better fuel penetration, translating into a 28% increase in the mixing efe ciency for a sweep angle decreased from 3.5 to i3.5 deg. It is observed that an air cushion between the wall and the hydrogen is sufe ciently thick to prevent fuel penetrating the boundary layer when 1 ) the fuel is injected at an angle of »10 deg or more, 2 ) an array spacing of at least the height of the injector is used, and 3 ) a swept ramp cone guration is avoided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA JournalSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207