Ventilatory Responses and Acute Acid-Base Changes in Response to Inhaled Carbon Dioxide in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure on Long-Term Haemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six patients with chronic renal failure on long-term haemodialysis were studied. Measurements of acid-base status, ventilatory responses to inhaled carbon dioxide, and the ability to buffer an acute respiratory acidosis were made before and after haemodialysis The resting arterial pCO2 values were all in the low normal range (mean 36.7, SD 1.7 mm Hg), with a mean pH of 7.37, SD 0.03. After haemodialysis, the arterial pCO9 values were not significantly different, despite a mean increase in pH of 0.09 units. There was no evidence of an increased sensitivity to carbon dioxide. There were no significant changes in the slopes or the intercepts of the carbon dioxide response lines following haemodialysis. After haemodialysis, the slopes of the [H+]/pCO2 buffer lines were not significantly different to those obtained before haemodialysis. It would appear that the blood of these patients probably has a reduced ability to buffer an acute respiratory acidosis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".