MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979235170 · doi:10.7448/ias.15.6.18112

Antiviral activity of dolutegravir in subjects with failure on an integrase inhibitor‐based regimen: week 24 phase 3 results from VIKING‐3

2012· article· en· W1979235170 on OpenAlexaff
Garrett Nichols, Anthony Mills, Robert Grossberg, Adriano Lazzarin, Franco Maggiolo, Jean‐Michel Molina, Gilles Pialoux, David P. Wright, Mounir Ait‐Khaled, J. Huang, Cindy Vavro, Brian Wynne, Justin Jui Yuan Yeo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International AIDS Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsGlaxoSmithKline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolutegravirRegimenMedicineIntegrase inhibitorResistance mutationPopulationViral loadInternal medicineGastroenterologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirologyAntiretroviral therapyRNABiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background VIKING‐3 aimed to examine efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) 50 mg twice daily in patients with resistance to multiple ARV classes, including integrase inhibitors (INI). Methods RAL and/or EVG‐resistant (current or historical) adult subjects with screening plasma HIV‐1 RNA ≥500 c/mL and resistance to ≥2 other ART classes received open‐label DTG 50 mg BID while continuing their failing regimen (without RAL/EVG). At Day 8 the background regimen was optimised and DTG continued. Activity of the optimized background regimen (OBR) was determined by Monogram Net Assessment. Primary endpoints were antiviral efficacy at Day 8 and Week 24. Results 183 subjects enrolled, 124 with INI‐resistance at screening and 59 with historical (but no screening) resistance. Population was advanced: at BL, median CD4 140, prior ART 13 yrs, 56% CDC Class C; 79% had >2 NRTI, 75% >1 NNRTI, and 70% >2 PI resistance‐associated mutations, and 61% had non‐R5 HIV detected. Of the 114 subjects who had the opportunity to complete 24 weeks on study before data cutoff, 72 (63%) had <50 c/mL RNA at Week 24 (SNAPSHOT algorithm). Mean HIV RNA declined by 1.4 log10 c/mL (95% CI: 1.3, 1.5; p < 0.001) at Day 8; response differed by genotype pathway (Table). Primary INI mutations at BL N Mean HIV RNA (log 10) Change from BL (SD) at Day 8 %>1 log HIV RNA decline of <50 c/mL at Day 8 TOTAL 183 −1.4 (0.61) 82% T66 1 −1.9 100% Y143 28 −1.7 (0.42) 96% N155 33 −1.4 (0.51) 82% Q148 + ≤1 secondary mutation # 32 −1.1 (0.51) 69% Q148 + ≥2 secondary mutations # 20 −1.0 (0.81) 48% ≥2 primary mutations 8 −1.4 (0.76) 75% No primary mutations 60 −1.6 (0.55) 95% Key secondary mutations comprised G140_ACS, L741, E138_AKT. In subjects with Q148 pathway mutations, virologic response decreased with increasing number of secondary mutations. Background overall susceptibility score (OSS) was not associated with Wk 24 response: % <50 c/mL were 83%, 63%, 59% and 69% for OSS 0, 1, 2 and >2, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events were uncommon (6/183, 3%); the most common drug‐related AEs were diarrhoea, nausea and headache, each reported in only 5% of subjects. Conclusion A majority of the highly treatment‐experienced subjects in VIKING‐3 achieved suppression with DTG‐based therapy. Responses were associated with Baseline IN genotype but not OSS, highlighting the importance and independence of DTG antiviral activity. DTG had a low rate of discontinuation due to adverse events at 50 mg BID in this advanced patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International AIDS SocietySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207