Unsupervised nonparametric classification of polarimetric SAR data using the K-nearest neighbor graph
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polarimetric SAR classifications are often based on assumptions about the shape of clusters in the data space. Such a scheme will fail for nonlinear structures in the feature space, unless the classification algorithm has the capacity to describe cluster shapes in sufficient generality. Existing polarimetric SAR classification methods are faced by this exact problem: typically they initialize clusters in the Cloude-Pottier parameter space [1], further optimizing them in the coherency matrix space [2, 3]. Methods using K-means [2] or agglomeration [3] require clusters that are spherical, or compact and well separated, respectively. In the Cloude-Pottier space, these requirements are not met, so initialization in the Cloude-Pottier space cannot be consistent with optimization by K-means or agglomeration. This paper sets out to address this problem, by implementing a new data-driven clustering approach, for arbitrarily shaped clusters. It is applied to quad-polarisation data, demonstrating the new methodology's potential for forest land-cover type discrimination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".