Inotropic Therapy for Right Ventricular Failure in Newborn Piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of right ventricular stunning on interventricular relationships in newborn piglets and to determine the effect of three commonly used inotropic treatment strategies. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled animal study. SETTING: Aarhus University Hospital, animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight newborn (4-d old) farm-bred piglets. INTERVENTIONS: Acute right ventricular failure was induced by 10 cycles of alternating 3 minutes of ischemia and reperfusion of the right coronary artery. After right ventricular failure was induced, treatment with epinephrine + milrinone, dopamine + milrinone, dobutamine, or control (saline) was initiated, and the animals were observed for 180 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Right and left ventricular systolic and diastolic variables were measured using pressure-volume loops recorded by conductance catheters. Arterial and central venous pressures were recorded, and cardiac index was determined by placing a flow probe around the pulmonary artery. Whole-body perfusion was evaluated by measuring pH and lactate in arterial blood samples. Induction of right ventricular stunning resulted in decreased ejection fraction (51% ± 4% vs 40% ± 12%, p = 0.0004); caused an interventricular septum deviation, decreased mean arterial pressure (49 ± 10 mm Hg vs 43 ± 11 mm Hg, p = 0.03), and increased blood lactate (1.85 ± 0.6 mM vs 5.79 ± 3.16 mM, p < 0.00001); and led to a decrease in blood pH (7.37 ± 0.08 vs 7.23 ± 0.13, p < 0.00001). A mortality rate greater than 50% was observed in the control group. All inotropic interventions increased contractility significantly in both the left and right ventricle. The effect of dobutamine on right ventricular failure decreased after 30 minutes and was indistinguishable from the control group after 3 hours. Dobutamine-treated animals had lower perfusion pressures and blood pH compared with epinephrine + milrinone and dopamine + milrinone groups. CONCLUSIONS: In newborn piglets, dobutamine had a nonsustained effect on right ventricular failure, resulting in decreased contractility and impaired perfusion compared with both dopamine and epinephrine administered in combination with milrinone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".