Investigation into the eroding dry-band arcing of filled silicone rubber under DC using wavelet-based multiresolution analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an investigation into the dry-band arcing mechanism leading to erosion of filled silicone rubber in the DC inclined plane test. Good correlation is obtained between the formation of surface residue, hotspots and the eroding dry-band arcing. The hotspots detected by infrared camera correlates well with the temperature of degradation determined by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. To characterize the physical mechanism of dry-band arcing, wavelet-based multiresolution analysis up to seven levels of resolution is applied to the leakage current waveforms. The analysis shows that both stable and intense discharges characterize the eroding dry-band arcing. A time-to-eroding parameter is proposed to determine the relative resistance to the formation of residue. Faster accumulation of residue is evident under -DC than +DC. Earlier inception of erosion is obtained for the silica filled- as compared to the alumina tri-hydrate filled- silicone, in which the release of the water of hydration is postulated to suppress the residue formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it