MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979334042 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.085406

Calculations of the threshold force and threshold power to move adsorbed nanoparticles

2005· article· en· W1979334042 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. Aruliah, Martin H. Müser, Udo D. Schwarz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDragQuasistatic processPhysicsMomentum transferOscillation (cell signaling)Cluster (spacecraft)Coupling (piping)Condensed matter physicsLattice (music)Particle (ecology)Materials scienceMechanicsClassical mechanicsOpticsScatteringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and analyze a simple model for the calculation of the power ${P}^{*}$ necessary to depin an essentially rigid cluster or nanoparticle on a surface with a scanning force microscope tip in tapping mode. The model contains the coupling between the particle's lateral and normal motion. We show that there are two important limiting regimes. (i) If momentum transfer occurs gradually between tip and particle, ${P}^{*}$ depends mainly on the viscous-type drag between particle and surface. (ii) If momentum transfer occurs instantaneously once per oscillation, ${P}^{*}$ is dominated by the minimum energy barrier necessary to move the cluster by one lattice constant. In the quasistatic driving mode (i), a critical impact angle ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\mathrm{t}}^{*}$ is identified below which depinning cannot be achieved due to lateral-normal coupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207