Network-Based Robust <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathscr {H}_{2}/\mathscr {H}_\infty $ </tex-math></inline-formula> Control for Linear Systems With Two-Channel Random Packet Dropouts and Time Delays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the robust output feedback H₂/H∞ control issue for a class of discrete-time networked control systems with uncertain parameters and external disturbance. Sensor-to-controller and controller-to-actuator packet dropouts and time delays are considered simultaneously. According to the stochastic characteristic of the packet dropouts and time delays, a model based on a Markov jump system framework is proposed to randomly compensate for the adverse effect of the two-channel packet dropouts and time delays. To analyze the robust stability of the resulting closed-loop system, a Lyapunov function is proposed, based on which sufficient conditions for the existence of the H₂/H∞ controller are derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities, ensuring robust stochastic stability as well as the prescribed H₂ and H∞ performance. Finally, an angular positioning system is exploited to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed design strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".