Aluminosilicates and biphasic HA-TCP composites: studies of properties for bony filling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aluminosilicate materials synthesized at room temperature present good mechanical properties. Hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate or both offer a high biocompatibility in the biomedical field. In this work, we focused on the composites resulting from associations of these materials. The best compromise between porosity and biomechanical properties versus different parameters was determined. The in vitro behaviour of compounds in contact with the simulated body fluid (SBF) was studied and in vivo experiments in a rabbit's thighbones were carried out. The inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) method permitted us to study the eventual release of Al from composites to SBF and to evaluate the chemical stability of composites characterized by the succession of SiO(4) and AlO(4) tetrahedra. The kinetic biomineralization, the bioconsolidation and biological studies were made. The results obtained show the chemical stability of composites. In the bone-implant interface, the intimate links reveal the high quality of the biointegration and the bioconsolidation between composites and bony matrix. Histological studies confirm good bony bonding and highlight the total absence of inflammation or fibrous tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it