MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979427747 · doi:10.2108/zsj.26.48

Evidence for Cryptic Genetic Discontinuity in a Recently Expanded Sika Deer Population on the Boso Peninsula, Central Japan

2009· article· en· W1979427747 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Masanobu Yoshio, Masahiko Asada, Keiji Ochiai, Koichi Goka, Haruki Tatsuta

Bibliographic record

VenueZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsPopulationBiologyGenetic structureGene flowPeninsulaEcologyEvolutionary biologyPopulation geneticsPopulation sizeGeneticsGenetic variationDemographyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genetic structure of populations is not necessarily reflected in the geographical proximity of individuals, because environmental gradients such as those of vegetation or climate can function as cryptic barriers to gene flow. We examined polymorphisms at nine microsatellite loci to determine and discuss whether a distinctive genetic structure was detectable in a spatially continuous population of the sika deer (Cervus nippon) on the Boso Peninsula of central Japan. Spatially explicit Bayesian analysis revealed that two genetically distinctive clusters exist in the Boso population. The spatial boundary of the two clusters approximately conformed to the border defined previously from a mitochondrial DNA dataset. By combining information on the geomorphic features surrounding the boundary and that on the lineage of 1970s population, we propose a schematic scenario for characterizing the population genetic structure to the present. The current population consists of genetically different lineages, and spatially discontinuous clusters have come into contact in the vicinity of a local road running along a steep-walled ravine that could act as principal barrier to gene flow. Biological factors such as distribution of vegetation and philopatric behavior might also have helped strengthen the cryptic genetic structure of the Boso population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZOOLOGICAL SCIENCESame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207