IMPROVED SEQUENCE-BASED PREDICTION OF STRAND RESIDUES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate identification of strand residues aids prediction and analysis of numerous structural and functional aspects of proteins. We propose a sequence-based predictor, BETArPRED, which improves prediction of strand residues and β-strand segments. BETArPRED uses a novel design that accepts strand residues predicted by SSpro and predicts the remaining positions utilizing a logistic regression classifier with nine custom-designed features. These are derived from the primary sequence, the secondary structure (SS) predicted by SSpro, PSIPRED and SPINE, and residue depth as predicted by RDpred. Our features utilize certain local (window-based) patterns in the predicted SS and combine information about the predicted SS and residue depth. BETArPRED is evaluated on 432 sequences that share low identity with the training chains, and on the CASP8 dataset. We compare BETArPRED with seven modern SS predictors, and the top-performing automated structure predictor in CASP8, the ZHANG-server. BETArPRED provides statistically significant improvements over each of the SS predictors; it improves prediction of strand residues and β-strands, and it finds β-strands that were missed by the other methods. When compared with the ZHANG-server, we improve predictions of strand segments and predict more actual strand residues, while the other predictor achieves higher rate of correct strand residue predictions when under-predicting them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".