MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979570519 · doi:10.1021/bm801330j

Core-Cross-Linked Alginate Microcapsules for Cell Encapsulation

2009· article· en· W1979570519 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad A. Jafar Mazumder, Nicholas A. D. Burke, Feng Shen, Murray Potter, Harald D. H. Stöver

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCell encapsulationCovalent bondPolyelectrolyteChemistryPolymer chemistryLysineMethacrylateMethacrylic acidGlucuronic acidPolymerCross-linkSodiumMicroparticleChemical engineeringSelf-healing hydrogelsCopolymerOrganic chemistryBiochemistryPolysaccharideAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-cross-linkable polyelectrolyte pairs comprised of poly(methacrylic acid, sodium salt-co-2-[methacryloyloxy]ethyl acetoacetate) (70:30 mol ratio, A70) and poly-L-lysine are incorporated into CaAlg beads to form either a covalently cross-linked shell or a core-cross-linked bead. In both cases the reactive polyanion is added to a solution of sodium alginate that may contain live cells and dropped into a calcium chloride gelling bath. Subsequent exposure to poly-L-lysine (15-30 kDa) leads to formation of a cross-linked shell, while exposure to lower molecular weight poly-L-lysine (4-15 kDa) leads to formation of an interpenetrating matrix of covalently cross-linked synthetic polymer within the CaAlg template. The resulting spherical composites are resistant to chemical and mechanical stress yet remain cyto-compatible. This approach to cell-encapsulation may be useful for cell immuno-isolation in therapeutic cell transplants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomacromoleculesSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207