MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979587889 · doi:10.2118/167176-ms

Analysis of Transient Linear Flow in Tight Oil and Gas Reservoirs with Stress-Sensitive Permeability and Multi-Phase Flow

2013· article· en· W1979587889 on OpenAlexafffund
Farhad Qanbari, Christopher R. Clarkson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)Tight gasFlow (mathematics)MechanicsRelative permeabilityVolumetric flow ratePetroleum engineeringFluid dynamicsTwo-phase flowTransient flowGeotechnical engineeringHydraulic fracturingGeologySteady state (chemistry)ChemistryPhysicsPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Horizontal wells and hydraulic fracturing are the key technologies that allow commercial production from tight oil and gas reservoirs. However, rigorous analysis of production data from these reservoirs requires incorporation of the impacts of stress-dependent permeability and multi-phase flow. Changes in the stress state of the system during production may reduce the absolute permeability. Furthermore, gas phase formation and flow in presence of supersaturated oil phase affects fluid dynamics in tight oil reservoirs. This study provides a rigorous methodology for incorporation of the effects of non-static permeability and multi-phase flow in rate transient analysis (RTA) of tight oil and gas reservoirs producing at variable rate/flowing pressures during transient linear flow period. Analytical solutions for the approximate linearized form of the flow equation have been widely used as the basis for RTA tools for conventional reservoirs during transient flow period. However, they lead to considerable error when applied to tight oil and gas reservoirs. In particular, during the transient linear flow period, the slope of the square -root-of-time plot obtained from numerical solution differs from the slope calculated by analytical methods. Efforts have been made by some researchers to obtain a correction factor from the numerical solution of the flow equation to correct the slope of the square-root-of-time plot for single phase flow of gas during transient linear flow period. In this study, an iterative method is used for evaluation of the slope correction factor in the presence of multi-phase flow and non-static permeability for constant-pressure production during transient linear flow period. Further, the correction factor is used for analysis of production data from tight oil and gas reservoirs producing at variable rate/flowing pressures. The correction factor is used in the analysis of different sets of synthetic production data for tight oil and gas reservoirs. The results show that the correction factor can reduce/eliminate the considerable errors associated with the conventional analytical methods in initial permeability estimation. For multi-phase flow cases, the producing gas -oil ratio (GOR) is used to estimate the oil saturation-pressure relationship in the reservoir, which is required for calculation pseudo-pressure and the correction factor. The method developed in this study alleviates the need for using numerical simulation models to generate empirical correlations for the correction factor for the square -root-of-time plot. The easy-to-implement iterative procedure of this method only requires the pressure dependencies of the constituent elements of the hydraulic diffusivity. Therefore, this method is applicable for analysis of production profiles for variety of reservoirs with nonlinear flow equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207