Comparison of the phytoestrogen <i>trans</i>‐resveratrol (3,4′,5‐trihydroxystilbene) structures from x‐ray diffraction and solution NMR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The NMR-derived solution structure of trans-3,4',5-trihydroxystilbene (resveratrol) was compared with two recent literature crystal x-ray structures, resveratrol in complex with human transthyretin (TTR-RES) from 1DVS.pdb and resveratrol bound to chalcone synthase (CHS-RES) from 1CGZ.pdb. 1H and 13C NMR spectra of resveratrol were acquired in DMSO-d6. Assignments were obtained from an analysis of DQF-COSY, TOCSY, DEPT, HMQC/HSQC, HMBC and INADEQUATE NMR spectra. Past 1H and 13C NMR literature assignments are corrected. The dihedral angle 2-1-1'-2' provides an indication of the relative spatial orientation of the two phenolic rings. Values of 1.62, - 54.10 and 12.6 +/- 1.1 degrees were found for the 1DVS.pdb, 1CGZ.pdb and NMR resveratrol structures, respectively. The 1DVS.pdb resveratrol structure is 'flat' with the two phenolic rings along the same plane. The 1CGZ.pdb structure has these two rings almost orthogonal to each other, and the NMR structure has these two rings much closer to being along the same plane. The angles 1-alpha--alpha' and 1'-alpha'--alpha are along the same trace and of similar magnitude for the 1CGZ.pdb and NMR resveratrol structures. For the 1DVS.pdb resveratrol structure, these angles are about 7-10 degrees greater, with alpha and alpha' being 180 degrees out-of-phase from the other two structures. The alpha rings did not overlap, with the NMR result representing a 'median model' of the two x-ray structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".