MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979650794 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-4169

Abstract 4169: The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is involved in KRAS-induced intestinal epithelial cell transformation

2012· article· en· W1979650794 on OpenAlexaff
Étienne Lemieux, Nathalie Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwayAXIN2KRASCateninCancer researchTCF4Beta-cateninSignal transductionMAPK/ERK pathwayBiologyCarcinogenesisCell biologyColorectal cancerCancerGeneticsGene expressionGenePromoter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aberrant regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is one of the major causes of colorectal cancer (CRC). The APC protein is an integral part of the destruction complex that controls cytoplasmic β-catenin levels by promoting ubiquitin-mediated degradation of β-catenin. Loss-of-function mutations in APC are commonly found in CRC, leading to constitutively high levels of β-catenin which then associates with TCF4, inducing expression of target genes that are important in cell growth. The KRAS/BRAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is also a major transforming growth regulatory signaling pathway. Indeed, gain-of-function mutations of KRAS and BRAF are detected in up to 60% of CRCs. Although both the Wnt/β-catenin and the ERK pathways are major pathways for tumorigenesis of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), no significant interactions between these pathways have been identified. Methods. Retrovirus encoding the HA-tagged wild-type MEK1 (wtMEK) or activated MEK1 (MEK1S218D/S222D, caMEK) or oncogenic form of KRASG12V were used to infect and transform normal IECs in culture. The transcriptional activity of β-catenin/TCF4 complex was analyzed by using the luciferase reporter systems TOPFLASH and c-myc promoter (mutated or not for TCF4 binding elements). Expression levels of Wnt/β-catenin targets axin2, lef-1 and c-myc were evaluated by qPCR and protein localisation by immunofluorescence. A dominant-negative form of TCF4 (TCF4-DN) was used to verify the contribution of β-catenin/TCF4 complex in transformation induced by oncogenic activation of KRAS or MEK1. β-catenin transcriptional activity was analyzed in human CRC cells exhibiting APC mutation, treated or not with the MEK inhibitor U0126. Results. 1- Phase-contrast microscopy revealed that KRASG12V and caMEK-expressing IECs underwent a morphological change from an epithelial morphology to an elongated morphology. Cells clearly loose cell-to-cell contacts when compared to control cells. E-cadherin and β-catenin proteins disappeared from cell-cell junctions. 2- β-catenin/TCF4 transcriptional activity as well as mRNA levels of c-myc, axin2 and lef1 were markedly increased in IECs transformed by oncogenic MEK1 or KRAS. 3- Expression of the dominant-negative form of TCF4 severely attenuated IEC transformation induced by oncogenic MEK1 or KRAS. 4- Treatment of human CRC cell lines with U0126 significantly reduced axin2, lef-1 and c-myc mRNA levels, indicating that expression of these β-catenin target genes is likely dependent on MEK/ERK activity. Accordingly, β-catenin/TCF4 transcriptional activity was inhibited following MEK inhibition by U0126 or ERK dephosphorylation by DUSP4 expression. Conclusion. Our data indicate that the oncogenic activation of the KRAS/ERK signalling pathway in IECs up-regulates β-catenin/TCF4 transcriptional activity which contributes to the tumorigenic potential of this signaling. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4169. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4169

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207