MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979663916 · doi:10.2113/gscpgbull.56.2.69

Detrital sources and sediment delivery to the early post-rift (Albian-Cenomanian) Newfoundland Basin east of the Grand Banks: results from ODP Leg 210

2007· article· en· W1979663916 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Richard N. Hiscott, Kathleen M. Marsaglia, Raymond C. Wilson, Alastair H.F. Robertson, Garry D. Karner, Brian E. Tucholke, Thomas Pletsch, R. Petschick

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyPaleocurrentDetritusCenomanianPaleontologyRiftProvenanceContinental marginStructural basinSedimentClastic rockGeochemistryTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The young narrow arm of the Atlantic Ocean that separated Newfoundland from Iberia in the Albian–Cenomanian accumulated a thick succession of muddy gravity flow deposits that were recovered by drilling at Ocean Drilling Program Site 1276 off the Grand Banks of Newfoundland. The sediment thickness and sand content are somewhat surprising given the number of contemporaneous shelf and slope basins that would have acted as traps for detritus shed from the Newfoundland margin. A set of individual studies was undertaken to trace the source of this detritus and to test hypotheses that the material might have been derived, in part, from the east (Iberia), the north (Flemish Cap and northern rift extensions), and/or from various sources to the west (Grand Banks, Interior Newfoundland, Avalon Uplift). By synthesizing seismic data, paleocurrent data from gravity flow deposits, sediment composition (sand detrital modes, clay mineralogy) and detrital mica ages we conclude that the likely source of the Albian–Cenomanian sediment was the Avalon Uplift, situated in the southern Grand Banks. Key pieces of evidence that lead us to this result are: thinning of the sediment package towards the north and thickening towards the southwest, the paleocurrent directions apparently suggesting a southwesterly source, the low proportion of potassium feldspar in the sandstones, and the lack of palygorskite in the shales as compared to Iberian-sourced successions. The apparent inconsistency of detrital mica ages from these deposits, suggesting an Iberian (Hercynian) source with age 270–340 Ma, is attributed to the localization of rifting along a Paleozoic continental suture zone, the Hercynian Front. This tectonic front separates distinctly different geologic units (domains) on the conjugate margins. Such a suture would have generated a significant peripheral foreland basin across the now-submerged shelf regions of Newfoundland allowing transfer of sediment from the Iberian to the Newfoundland domains. Upon Mesozoic rifting and uplift, these mica-bearing sediments from the foreland basin succession could have been reworked and shed eastward into the nascent Atlantic Ocean basin at ODP Site 1276. Alternatively, Hercynian metamorphism and deformation might have extended onto what is now the southeastern Grand Banks, so that young detrital micas could have been derived directly from the Avalon Uplift. Results from this work are relevant to an assessment of sandstone distribution in parts of the Salar Basin and the expected diagenetic overprint for sandy reservoir facies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207