Neurochemical Studies with St. John's WortInVitro
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of extracts and constituents of St. John's wort, Hypericum perforatum, at various CNS receptors were studied by radioligand binding techniques in order to determine a profile of pharmacological activity in vitro. Binding inhibition was examined for the G-protein coupled opioid, serotonin (5-HT), histamine, neurokinin and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptors, for the steroid estrogen-alpha receptor and for the ligand-gated ionchannel GABA(A) receptor. Hypericin showed the most potent binding inhibiton of all tested constituents to human CRF1 receptor with an IC50 value of 300 nM. Preliminary GTPgamma35S binding studies to CRF1 coupled G-protein indicated an antagonistic action for hypericin. The acylphloroglucinole hyperforin failed to inhibit 125I-astressin binding to hCRF, receptor up to 10 microM. Hyperforin inhibited binding to opioid and serotonin (5-HT) receptors at IC50 values between 0.4 and 3 microM, while hypericin and pseudohypericin inhibited with weaker potency. The biflavonoid I3,II8-biapigenin inhibited 3H-estradiol binding to the estrogen-alpha receptor with an IC50 value of 1 microM. The inhibition of 3H-muscimol binding to the GABA(A) receptor is likely to be exclusively due to GABA present in the extract. We therefore hypothesize that additive or synergistic actions of several ditsinct compounds may be responsible for the beneficial antidepressant effect of St. John's wort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it