MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979753468 · doi:10.1021/la035154h

Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Nanobalance (EQCN) Studies of Protein Interfacial Behavior at Pt

2004· article· en· W1979753468 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas P. Cosman, Sharon G. Roscoe

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryQuartz crystal microbalanceAdsorptionPlatinumCyclic voltammetryElectrochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Molar massGibbs free energyCrystal (programming language)MonolayerProtein adsorptionElectrodeInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryChromatographyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interfacial behavior of a variety of proteins ranging in molar mass from 2500 to 340 000 g mol -1 was studied at a Pt electrode surface at 298 K using the electrochemical quartz crystal nanobalance (EQCN) technique of simultaneous measurements of frequency and cyclic voltammetry (CV). It was shown that the EQCN frequency measurements did not directly monitor the molar mass of the adsorbed protein at anodic potentials but instead measured changes in the surface oxide in the absence and presence of adsorbed protein. However, at a potential characteristic of the double layer for platinum, EQCN frequency measurements gave a measure of the extent of solvent displacement by the adsorbed protein. The values for the Gibbs free energy of adsorption, Δ G ADS, obtained with these EQCN frequency measurements gave excellent agreement within experimental uncertainty with those obtained from the simultaneous CV measurements for all proteins studied. The adsorption process was modeled using the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. The smallest molecules studied, chain A and chain B of insulin, have the lowest affinity for the platinum surface as indicated by their small negative Δ G ADS values, while the larger proteins, such as fibrinogen, have the greatest affinity for the platinum surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207