The effect of varying Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> percentage in hydroxyapatite/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite materials: Morphological, chemical and cytotoxic evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) and HA-alumina (HA/Al2O3) composites, with Al2O3 contents of 5, 10, 20, and 30%, were synthesized using a wet precipitation method and sintered at 900 and 1300 degrees C. We investigated the effect of sintering temperature and relative concentration of HA and Al2O3 on the chemical composition, surface morphology, and cytotoxicity of the composite powders. The XRD results show that in the 1300 degrees C composites, HA partially decomposed into CaO which combined with Al2O3 to form different calcium aluminates. For the 900 degrees C composites the CaO phase was not detected, though a Ca/P ratio larger than 1.67 measured by XPS suggests that CaO was present in trace amounts. SEM-EDX analysis indicated that the HA microstructure was affected by the sintering temperature, and this HA is present on the surface of Al2O3 particles. The cytotoxicity of the composites was assessed indirectly using the MTT assay. The short-term effect of leachables was quantified by exposing a L929 mouse fibroblast cell line to the degradation products released by the composites after immersion in the cell culture medium. Degradation products were less toxic to L-929 at lower extract concentrations (10, 50%) than at 100% concentration. Cell viability was also influenced by leachable size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".