Yukon–Tanana terrane in the southern Campbell Range, Finlayson Lake belt, southeastern Yukon: the geological setting of retrogressed eclogite of the Klatsa metamorphic complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yukon–Tanana terrane in the southern Campbell Range is composed of rocks that have different metamorphic, exhumation, and structural histories, and that have formed in disparate parts of the Paleozoic Yukon–Tanana volcanic arc. The geological relationships in the southern Campbell Range reveal the tectonic and structural history of the Klatsa metamorphic complex, which represents the remnants of an Early Mississippian subduction zone beneath the Yukon–Tanana arc. The Klatsa metamorphic complex is composed of foliated to massive serpentinite, leucogabbro, amphibolite, and retrogressed eclogitic quartz–muscovite schist with lenses of metabasite. It was structurally juxtaposed on Upper Mississippian to Lower Permian metasedimentary rocks of the White Lake, King Arctic, and Money Creek formations. Regional and local structural and stratigraphic relationships suggest that the Klatsa metamorphic complex is part of the Cleaver Lake thrust sheet, the structurally highest thrust sheet in a north- to northeast-vergent thrust belt that deformed the Yukon–Tanana terrane during the Early Permian. Restoration of the displacement on the Cleaver Lake and underlying thrust faults places the Klatsa metamorphic complex on the western margin of Yukon–Tanana terrane. Late Devonian to Early Mississippian subduction is thought to have occurred along this margin based on previous paleogeographic reconstructions. Generally north- to northeast-vergent D1 to D3 folds deformed the Klatsa metamorphic complex and adjacent metasedimentary rocks. Jurassic(?) D4 imbricate thrust faulting has, in part, reactivated the Cleaver Lake thrust fault contacts and imbricated the Klatsa metamorphic complex with metasedimentary rocks in fault panels that are repeated at a scale of 10 to hundreds of metres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".