MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979823594 · doi:10.2118/172888-ms

Foam Stability of Solvent/Surfactant/Heavy-Oil System Under Reservior Conditions

2014· article· en· W1979823594 on OpenAlex
Chao Wang, Huazhou Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantSolventCritical micelle concentrationChemical engineeringPhase (matter)Materials scienceViscosityEnhanced oil recoveryChromatographyChemistrySpargingMicelleComposite materialAqueous solutionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solvent-based method is an important method for recovering heavy oil. In the case of solvent flooding, its sweeping efficiency might be adversely affected by the sharp difference in mobility between solvent and heavy oil. It is of great importance to develop new techniques for decreasing the mobility of solvent phase. Solvent-alternating-surfactant injection, where foam creation can be expected, might be a feasible approach for achieving such purpose by increasing the apparent viscosity of solvent phase. The foam stability plays an important role in this process. In this study, the foam stability of C3H8/surfactant/heavy-oil system under reservoir condition has been examined experimentally by using the pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) system. The following factors are considered in the experiments: surfactant concentration, salinity, temperature, and the presence of pure C16H34 as pseudo-heavy oil. During the experiments, foam is generated by sparging C3H8 at a constant flow rate through the surfactant Triton X-100 solution and then stirring the mixture with a magnetic stirrer. The foam stability is subsequently evaluated in terms of its height change as a function of time. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of surfactant Triton X-100 is confirmed firstly by conducting three runs of experiments at three different surfactant concentrations. Then the foam stability tests are performed by using such validated CMC at different salt concentrations and different temperatures. It is found that the increasing surfactant concentration contributes to an increase in foam stability, while foam stability is insensitive to surfactant concentration when the surfactant concentration is above the threshold CMC. An elevated temperature is detrimental to foam stability. At a higher temperature, the effective surfactant CMC also increases. Foam stability is negatively affected by increasing salinity; but such negative effect is found to be in small scale. As the C16H34 is added to the solution, significant decrease of foam stability occurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it