MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979834676 · doi:10.1118/1.4734850

SU‐E‐J‐17: Evaluation of Metal Artifact Reduction in MVCTs Using a Model Based Image Reconstruction Method

2012· article· en· W1979834676 on OpenAlexaffabout
Moti Paudel, M. Mackenzie, B. G. Fallone, S Rathee

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRodImaging phantomBremsstrahlungMaterials scienceIterative reconstructionOpticsAttenuationDetectorProjection (relational algebra)Cathode rayPhysicsPhotonElectronMathematicsComputer scienceNuclear physicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a model based image reconstruction in reducing metal artifacts in MVCT systems, and to compare with filtered-back projection (FBP) technique. METHODS: Iterative maximum likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT (IMPACT) is used with pair/triplet production process and the energy dependent response of detectors. The beam spectra for in-house bench-top and TomotherapyTM MVCT are modelled for use in IMPACT. The energy dependent gain of detectors is calculated using a constrained optimization technique and measured attenuation produced by 0 - 24 cm thick solid water slabs. A cylindrical (19 cm diameter) plexiglass phantom containing various central cylindrical inserts (relative electron density of 0.28-1.69) between two steel rods (2 cm diameter) is scanned in the bench-top [the bremsstrahlung radiation from 6 MeV electron beam passed through 4 cm solid water on the Varian Clinac 2300C] and TomotherapyTM MVCTs. The FBP reconstructs images from raw signal normalised to air scan and corrected for beam hardening using a uniform plexi-glass cylinder (20 cm diameter). IMPACT starts with FBP reconstructed seed image and reconstructs final image at 1.25 MeV in 150 iterations. RESULTS: FBP produces a visible dark shading in the image between two steel rods that becomes darker with higher density central insert causing 5-8 % underestimation of electron density compared to the case without the steel rods. In the IMPACT image the dark shading connecting the steel rods is nearly removed and the uniform background restored. The average attenuation coefficients of the inserts and the background are very close to the corresponding theoretical values at 1.25 MeV. CONCLUSIONS: The dark shading metal artifact due to beam hardening can be removed in MVCT using the iterative reconstruction algorithm such as IMPACT. However, the accurate modelling of detectors' energy dependent response and physical processes are crucial for successful implementation. Funding support for the research is obtained from "Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship" and "Canadian Institute of Health Research".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207