Study of Carrier Generation in Phthalocyanines by Time-Resolved Fluorescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied the influence of electric field on fluorescence in particles of photoconductive TiOPc (I), TiOPc (IV), HOGaPc, and x-H 2 Pc dispersed in a polymer matrix. Electric field induced quenching of both the integrated and time-resolved fluorescence were measured. Time-resolved fluorescence decays were analyzed by fitting the data to a sum of two exponentials, representing the fast and slow fluorescence components. For HOGaPc, TiOPc(I), and TiOPc (IV), the fast fluorescence component exhibits both amplitude and lifetime quenching. These results indicate that carrier generation in HOGaPc, TiOPc(I), and TiOPc (IV) originates from both relaxed and nonrelaxed intrinsic excited singlet states, while the trapped excitons do not lead to significant carrier production. In contrast, for x-H 2 Pc, significant amplitude quenching of the fast component is observed only at high field, and the trapped excitons are an important source of photogenerated carriers. This indicates that x-H 2 Pc possesses at least some bulk-sensitized photocarrier generation. All of the phthalocyanines studied exhibited a quadratic dependence of integrated fluorescence quenching on electric field, indicating the existence of a neutral carrier precursor state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".