MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979923830 · doi:10.1021/jp020700l

Study of Carrier Generation in Phthalocyanines by Time-Resolved Fluorescence

2002· article· en· W1979923830 on OpenAlexaff
Zoran D. Popović, M. Iltaf Khan, Ah‐Mee Hor, Joshua L. Goodman, John F. Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsXerox (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuenching (fluorescence)FluorescenceElectric fieldExcitonPhotoconductivityPhthalocyanineExcited statePhotochemistryChemistryAmplitudeMaterials scienceMolecular physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsAtomic physicsOpticsNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the influence of electric field on fluorescence in particles of photoconductive TiOPc (I), TiOPc (IV), HOGaPc, and x-H 2 Pc dispersed in a polymer matrix. Electric field induced quenching of both the integrated and time-resolved fluorescence were measured. Time-resolved fluorescence decays were analyzed by fitting the data to a sum of two exponentials, representing the fast and slow fluorescence components. For HOGaPc, TiOPc(I), and TiOPc (IV), the fast fluorescence component exhibits both amplitude and lifetime quenching. These results indicate that carrier generation in HOGaPc, TiOPc(I), and TiOPc (IV) originates from both relaxed and nonrelaxed intrinsic excited singlet states, while the trapped excitons do not lead to significant carrier production. In contrast, for x-H 2 Pc, significant amplitude quenching of the fast component is observed only at high field, and the trapped excitons are an important source of photogenerated carriers. This indicates that x-H 2 Pc possesses at least some bulk-sensitized photocarrier generation. All of the phthalocyanines studied exhibited a quadratic dependence of integrated fluorescence quenching on electric field, indicating the existence of a neutral carrier precursor state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207