A reduction sensitive cascade biodegradable linear polymer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cascade degradable linear polymers offer the potential for a high degree of control over the degradation process. They comprise a backbone that is stable in the presence of an end cap, but upon removal of the end cap a cascade of intramolecular reactions is initiated that leads of depolymerization of the polymer backbone. Reported here is a new polymer backbone based on N , N ′‐dimethylethylenediamine and 2‐mercaptoethanol linked by carbamates and thiocarbamates. A disulfide end cap was incorporated such that its cleavage under reducing conditions revealed the thiol of 2‐mercaptoethanol, leading to alternating cyclizations of the 2‐mercaptoethanol and N , N ′‐dimethylethylenediamine moieties to provide 1,3‐oxathiolan‐2‐one and N , N ′‐dimethylimidazolidinone, respectively. The degradation was monitored by 1 H NMR and GPC. The expected products were observed, along with a portion of nondegradable polymer that was likely cyclic species. Overall, the results demonstrate the promise of this new class of polymers to degrade selectively in reducing environments such as hypoxic tumor tissue or the intracellular compartments of cells. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 3977–3985, 2010
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it