Organosilicas with Chiral Bridges and Self-Generating Mesoporosity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amine-functionalized, chiral mesoporous organosilicas were prepared from a rationally designed precursor, which combines the functions of a network builder, a chiral latent functional group, and a porogen in one molecule. The precursors are formed by a convenient enantioselective hydroboration using ( S )-monoisopinocampheylborane on an ethylene-bridged silica precursor. These precursors do self-organize when hydrolysis of their inorganic moiety takes place via an aggregation of their organic moiety into hydrophobic domains. After a condensation−ammonolysis sequence mesoporous organosilicas functionalized with chiral amine groups are obtained, with the complete chiral functionalities located at the pore wall surface and therefore accessible to chemical processes. The pore size of the resulting organosilicas can be fine-tuned using different organic moieties attached to the boron group in the first step. While a wormlike arrangement of pores is observed for the pure precursor, common surfactants can be admixed to further control and tailor the resulting mesoporous system. In certain phase ranges, also chiral periodic mesoporous organosilicas can be obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".