Investigation of coated whey protein/alginate beads as sustained release dosage form in simulated gastrointestinal environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: The biopharmaceutical behavior of new formulations based on both food-grade polymers, whey protein (WP) and alginate (ALG) was studied using different in vitro methods. The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) class I drug Theophylline was chosen as drug model. METHOD: Drug release was studied (i) at pH 1.2 (2 hours) followed by pH 7.5, and in simulated gastric fluid (SGF; 2 hours) followed by simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) using the paddle method and (ii) in an artificial digestive system. RESULTS: Freeze-dried mixed WP/ALG (62/38) beads were coated with WP or ALG with encapsulation efficiency 34.9% and 18.3%, respectively. At pH 1.2, coated beads exhibited gastroresistant properties (< 10% of drug released after 2 hours) followed at pH 7.5 by a sustained release behavior (< 60% of drug released at 24 hours) controlled by an erosion mechanism. In SGF, despite enzyme hydrolysis, drug release was still controlled due to ALG shrinkage. After transfer in SIF, formulations were completely degraded in less than 2 h with total drug release. In an artificial digestive system, coated beads appeared gastroresistant, intestinal part sustained drug release was controlled by erosion. CONCLUSION: Combination of in vitro methods allowed prediction of the in vivo potentialities of WP- and ALG- coated WP/ALG beads as oral sustained release systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it