MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980008501 · doi:10.1021/es001053j

Persistent Chlorinated Pesticides in Air, Water, and Precipitation from the Lake Malawi Area, Southern Africa

2000· article· en· W1980008501 on OpenAlexaff
Heidi Karlsson, Derek C. G. Muir, Camilla F. Teixiera, Deborah A. Burniston, William M. J. Strachan, Robert E. Hecky, Joseph Mwita, Harvey A. Bootsma, Norbert P. Grift, Karen A. Kidd, Bruno Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePesticideBayHeptachlorDieldrinHydrology (agriculture)Water columnEnvironmental chemistryOceanographyEcologyGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concentrations of chlorinated pesticides were analyzed in air (biweekly 1997−1998), water, and precipitation at Lake Malawi, in southeast Africa. The pesticides in air in Senga Bay on the southwest shore of Lake Malawi were not extensively weathered, implying recent use. Elevated levels of heptachlor, chlorobenzenes, aldrin, and dieldrin were detected periodically, which indicated use on a regular basis. Annual average concentrations for those pesticides ranged from 31 to 257 pg/m 3 . Levels of HCHs, DDTs, chlordanes, and α-endosufan in air at Senga Bay were comparable to those of the Laurentian Great Lakes, ranging from 24 to 40 pg/m 3 . Considering air−water gas exchange and wet deposition, the net fluxes of chlorinated pesticides to the lake surface were depositional. Concentrations of chlorinated pesticides in the water from Lake Malawi were relatively low compared to the Laurentian Great Lakes and Lake Baikal. This indicates rapid transformation of chemicals in the water column, which was further supported by high metabolite-to-parent ratios. The results suggests that tropical regions may act as both a global source and sink for chlorinated pesticides, since removal processes may be faster compared to temperate and Arctic regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityFrench-language works237,207