Immunostimulatory and Anti-inflammatory Polysaccharides from<i>Tripterygium wilfordii</i>.: Comparison with Organic Extracts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The organic extracts of Tripterygium wilfordii. Hook F. (Celastraceae) have been used in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases for many years in China, although they also possess significant toxicity. These extracts are anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive in nature, suppressing lipopolyscacharide (LPS)-stimulated upregulation of NF kappa B gene expression. In the current study, an ethyl acetate (EA) extract and a crude hot water soluble polysaccharide (PS) fraction from T. wilfordii. were compared. Both fractions were effective in reducing LPS-stimulated NO accumulation in cultured RAW 267.4 macrophages in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 values of 1.7 and 32.1 μ g/mL for EA and PS, respectively). The LC50 of EA (19.8–22.3 μ g/mL) was significantly greater than that of PS, which exhibited no apparent cytotoxicity toward either macrophages or EAhy 926 endothelial cells (up to 10 mg/mL). We also showed that PS was able to stimulate NO production by untreated macrophages in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, depending on the experimental condition of cultured macrophages, a crude PS fraction of T. wilfordii. may exhibit immunostimulatory or anti-inflammatory effects. This unique property, together with its relatively low level of toxicity, supports further investigation of its role in diseases in which inflammation and immunomodulation are critical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it