Physiological Daily Inhalation Rates for Free-Living Individuals Aged 1 Month to 96 Years, Using Data from Doubly Labeled Water Measurements: A Proposal for Air Quality Criteria, Standard Calculations and Health Risk Assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reported disappearance rates of oral doses of doubly labeled water (2H2O and H2 18O) in urine, monitored by gas-isotope-ratio mass spectrometry for an aggregate period of over 30,000 days and completed with indirect calorimetry and nutritional balance measurements, have been used to determine physiological daily inhalation rates for 2210 individuals aged 3 weeks to 96 years. Rates in m3/kg-day for healthy normal-weight individuals (n = 1252) were higher by 6 to 21% compared to their overweight/obese counterparts (n = 679). Rates for healthy normal-weight males and females drop by about 66 to 75% within the course of a lifetime. Infants and children between the age of 3 weeks to less than 7 years inhale 1.6 to 4.3 times more air (0.395 ± 0.048 to 0.739 ± 0.071 m3/kg-day, mean ± S.D., n = 581) than adults aged 23 to 96 years (0.172 ± 0.037 to 0.247 ± 0.039 m3/kg-day, n = 388). The 99th percentile rate of 0.725 m3/kg-day based on measurements for boys aged 2.6 to less than 6 months is recommended for air quality criteria and standard calculation for non-carcinogenic compounds pertaining to individuals of any age or gender (normality confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, p ≥ 0.05). This rate is 2.5-fold more protective than the daily inhalation estimate of 0.286 m3/kg-day published by the Federal Register in 1980 (i.e., 20 m3/day for a 70-kg adult). It ensures that very few newborns aged 1 month and younger, less than 1% of infants aged 2.6 to less than 6 months and of course no older individuals up to 96 years of age inhale more toxic chemicals than associated safe doses which are not anticipated to result in any adverse effects in humans, when air concentration reaches the resulting air quality criteria and standard values. This rate is also protective for underweight, overweight, and obese individuals. Finally, as far as newborns are concerned, a rate of 0.956 m3/kg-day based on the 99th percentile estimates is recommended for short-term criteria and standard calculations for toxic chemicals that yield adverse effects over instantaneous to short-term duration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".