Protein kinase C isozymes and their selectivity towards ruboxistaurin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes are an important class of enzymes in cell signaling and as drug targets. They are involved in specific pathways and have selectivity towards certain ligands, despite their high sequence similarities. Ruboxistaurin is a specific inhibitor of PKC-beta. To understand the molecular determinants for the selectivity of ruboxistaurin, we derived the three-dimensional structures of the kinase domains of PKC-alpha, -betaI, and -zeta using homology modeling. Several binding orientations of ruboxistaurin in the binding sites of these PKC catalytic domains were analyzed, and a putative alternative binding site for PKC-zeta was identified in its kinase domain. The calculated free energy of binding correlates well with the IC(50) of the inhibitor against each PKC isozyme. A residue-based energy decomposition analysis attributed the binding free energy to several key residues in the catalytic sites of these enzymes, revealing potential protein-ligand interactions responsible for ligand binding. The contiguous binding site revealed in the catalytic domain of PKC-zeta provides avenues for selective drug design. The details of structural nuances for specific inhibition of PKC isozymes are presented in the context of the three-dimensional structures of this important class of enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it