MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980182636 · doi:10.1021/la063551x

Fluorescence from an Azobenzene-Containing Diblock Copolymer Micelle in Solution

2007· article· en· W1980182636 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Qi, Yue Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhotochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzobenzenePhotoisomerizationFluorescenceMicellePhotochemistryChemistryCopolymerAqueous solutionPolymerAmphiphileMicellar solutionsPolymer chemistryIsomerizationOrganic chemistryCatalysisOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the observation of unusual fluorescence emission from an azobenzene-containing polymer micellar solution. An amphiphilic diblock copolymer composed of the hydrophilic quaternized poly(4-vinyl pyridine) (QP4VP) and a hydrophobic liquid crystalline polymethacrylate bearing azobenzene side groups (PAzoMA) is nonfluorescent in molecularly dissolved state in N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) but becomes fluorescent as a result of the micellization upon addition of water, which confines azobenzene groups into the core region of micellar aggregates. Experimental results suggest that the micellization-enhanced fluorescence was caused by a slowdown, due to the confinement effect, in the rate of the trans-to-cis photoisomerization that is the main nonradiative relaxation process for excited azobenzene groups in the trans form. Furthermore, it was found that the fluorescence intensity of aqueous micellar solution is sensitive to changes in pH (reversible fluorescence variation) and to illumination (irreversible fluorescence variation). The results indicate that a subtle change in the state of polymer micellar association may alter the confining state of azobenzene groups responsible for the fluorescence emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicPhotochromic and Fluorescence ChemistryFrench-language works237,207