Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in acute myocardial infarction: cellular expression and use of selective COX-2 inhibitor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our previous work has shown strong expression of COX-2 in the myocardium of patients with end-stage ischemic heart failure. The purpose of this study was to determine the cellular expression of this enzyme in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and determine the role of COX-2 in experimental animals using a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Experimental AMI was induced in rats by ligating the left coronary artery. Animals were either treated with a selective COX-2 inhibitor (5 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) or vehicle. Three days after ligation, cardiac function was assessed and infarct size was determined. Myocardial specimens were immunostained with antiserum to COX-2. Plasma concentration of prostanoids was measured by enzyme immunoassay. There was strong expression of COX-2 in the myocytes, endocardium, vascular endothelial cells, and macrophages in the infarcted zone of the myocardium. In contrast, little expression was seen in the myocardium of control rats. Animals treated with the COX-2 inhibitor showed a significant improvement in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure (P < 0.05) and LV systolic pressure (P < 0.01), and a reduction in infarct size (P < 0.05). Inhibition of COX-2 significantly decreased plasma concentration of thromboxane B2 (P < 0.05); however, it did not affect 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha. Induction of COX-2 during AMI appears to contribute to myocardial injury, and treatment with the specific inhibitor of the enzyme ameliorated the course of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".