Mathematical modelling of a vehicle crash with emphasis on the dynamic response analysis of extendable cubic nonlinear dampers using the incremental harmonic balance method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new direction of crashworthiness improvement using a smart extendable front-end structure is introduced in this paper to support the function of the existing vehicle structure. The smart front-end structure consists of two extendable, independently controlled hydraulic cylinders (dampers) integrated with the front-end longitudinal members. The main objectives of the smart front-end structure are to find solutions of the trade-off problem faced by the designer for offset collision events and to mitigate full frontal collisions. The work carried out in this paper includes developing and analysing mathematical models of different vehicle crash scenarios, including vehicle-to-vehicle frontal collision in both full and offset events. In these models, vehicle components are modelled by lumped masses and cubic non-linear springs. The hydraulic cylinders are represented by cubic non-linear damper elements. In this paper, the dynamic responses of the crash events are obtained with the aid of an analytical approach using the incremental harmonic balance method. The intrusion injury as the maximum deformation of the front-end structure and the occupant deceleration injury are used for interpreting the results. It is demonstrated from simulation results that significant improvements to both intrusion and deceleration injuries are obtained using the smart front-end structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it