The avian B‐cell receptor complex: distinct roles of Igα and Igβ in B‐cell development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bursa of Fabricius has evolved in birds as a gut-associated site of B-cell lymphopoiesis that is segregated from the development of other hematopoietic lineages. Despite differences in the developmental progression of chicken as compared to murine B-cell lymphopoiesis, cell-surface immunoglobulin (sIg) expression has been conserved in birds as an essential checkpoint in B-cell development. B-cell precursors that express an sIg complex that includes the evolutionarily conserved Igalpha/beta heterodimer colonize lymphoid follicles in the bursa, whereas B-cell precursors that fail to express sIg due to non-productive V(D)J recombination are eliminated. Productive retroviral gene transfer has allowed us to introduce chimeric receptor constructs into developing B-cell precursors in vivo. Chimeric proteins comprising the extracellular and transmembrane regions of murine CD8alpha fused to the cytoplasmic domain of chicken Igalpha efficiently supported B-cell development in precursors that lacked endogenous sIg expression. By contrast, expression of an equivalent chimeric receptor containing the cytoplasmic domain of Igbeta actively inhibited B-cell development. Consequently, the cytoplasmic domains of Igalpha and Igbeta play functionally distinct roles in chicken B-cell development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".