Methanolysis of organophosphorus esters promoted by an M<sup>2+</sup> catalyst supported on polystyrene-based copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The methanolysis of three neutral organophosphorus esters (a phosphonate, a phosphonothioate, and a phosphorothionate) promoted by several polymer-supported Zn(II) or Cu(II) containing catalysts was studied. The catalysts consist of a Zn(II) or Cu(II) complex with 1,5,9-triazacyclododecane or phenanthroline attached to a porous polystyrene resin. In each case, the polymer supported catalyst showed activity at near neutral s s pH in methanol (8.38) and ambient temperature and provided accelerations of up to a factor of 2.9 × 10 6 relative to the background reaction at s s pH 9.05. The solid materials could be reused several times and could be reactivated when the activity diminished. Various polymers of different porosity and extent of cross-linking were studied, with the net result being that larger porosities offer the best reactivity for catalyzed methanolysis of these OP species in methanol. This is explained by different parameters including the accessibility to reactive sites, the increase of concentration of catalytic sites on the surface of the polymer, and some cooperative effects between neighboring catalytic groups.Key words: functionalized polymer, metal containing, methanolysis, organophosphorus pesticides and CW agents, catalyst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".