MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980350681 · doi:10.2202/1553-779x.1279

Harmonic Reducing ANN Controller for a SVC Compensating Unbalanced Fluctuating Loads

2006· article· en· W1980350681 on OpenAlexaff
Athula Rajapakse, Anawat Puangpairoj

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Fuzzy logicHarmonicsStatic VAR compensatorComputer scienceTotal harmonic distortionAC powerElectric power systemHarmonicArtificial neural networkComputationControl engineeringPower (physics)VoltageEngineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of an artificial neural network (ANN) controller for a Static Var Compensator (SVC) system compensating unbalanced fluctuating loads. The proposed controller can balance and reduce the reactive power drawn from the source under unbalanced loads while keeping harmonic injection to the system due to SVC operation low. The first stage of controller development is a fuzzy logic based control algorithm. This algorithm determines a number of possible operating states of SVC for a given load condition and calculates corresponding harmonics injections. Then a fuzzy logic system is used to rank those operating states in terms of the magnitude of the reactive power drawn from the source and the harmonic injection level indicated by Total Demand Distortion (TDD). The best operating state is selected based on the ranking score assigned by the fuzzy logic ranking system. Finally, computational speed of the controller is improved by replacing the analytical and fuzzy computations by a set of neural networks trained with data generated with fuzzy logic based controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Emerging Electric Power SystemsSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207