MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980351886 · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.2103

Ranking the burden of infectious diseases in Ontario, Canada

2010· article· en· W1980351886 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sujitha Ratnasingham, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Nick Daneman, Michael A. Campitelli, Natasha S. Crowcroft

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineYears of potential life lostPublic healthPopulationDisease burdenEnvironmental healthEpidemiologyDisability-adjusted life yearHepatitis ADiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)ImmunologyHepatitisLife expectancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Evidence-based priority-setting requires knowledge about the relative contributions of diseases to the loss of healthy life. The Global Burden of Disease method uses the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY), a measure that incorporates the population burden of mortality and morbidity, to compare the relative contributions of diseases. We calculated DALYs for infectious pathogens in Ontario to inform the policies of the province's new public health agency. Methods: The DALY is a health gap measure comprising two components: 1) years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLL); and 2) years of “healthy” life lost due to disability (YLD). Health gap measures quantify the amount of “healthy” life lost by estimating the difference between actual population health and a specified ideal. We used an incidence-based approach and incorporated modeling techniques where possible to estimate the disease burden of various infectious disease agents. Data sources included census estimates, vital statistics, public health reportable disease data, health care utilization data, cancer registries, and epidemiological studies. Results: For most infectious diseases, mortality (YLLs) contributed more to DALYs than morbidity (YLDs). Overall, the infectious agents accounting for the greatest burden were: influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, hepatitis C virus (HCV), Escherichia coli, Gram negative bacteria excluding E. coli, HIV/AIDS, Staphylococcus aureus, human papilloma virus (HPV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and other Gram positive bacteria. The DALYs for HPV and urinary tract infections were greater in females while the DALYs for HIV/AIDS, HCV, and HBV were greater in males. Conclusion: Strategic priorities for specific infectious diseases in Ontario should focus on those identified here to have the greatest burden. Further work is also required to improve the timeliness of data access and the quality of information available. While the prevention of some infectious diseases will require the development of novel interventions, much of Ontario's infectious disease burden could be reduced through better implementation of existing interventions. Abstracts for SupplementInternational Journal of Infectious DiseasesVol. 14Preview Full-Text PDF Open Archive

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207