MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980394328 · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-3917

TRIENNIAL GROWTH SYMPOSIUM: Dietary regulation of growth and development1

2011· article· en· W1980394328 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William T. Oliver

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDigestive system and related health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibroblast growth factor 23Experimental biologyGrowth hormoneEndocrine systemEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicinePhysiologyPolitical scienceBiologyHormoneParathyroid hormoneComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2010 Triennial Growth Symposium was held immediately before the Joint Annual Meeting of the American Society of Animal Science, American Dairy Science Association, Poultry Science Association, Asociación Mexicana de Producción Animal, Canadian Society of Animal Science, and the Western Section of the American Society of Animal Science in Denver, Colorado, in July 2010. The intent of the symposium was to identify and explore some new findings on the nutritional regulation of growth and development of domestic animals. Nutrition has a profound impact on the developing animal. The symposium program committee decided it was time for an update on recent advances in this area. Crenshaw et al. (2011) began the symposium by reviewing recent developments in skeletal growth and development. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), discovered in the last decade, is involved in a pathway for P homeostasis. An endocrine function of bone itself is described, producing FGF23, which then acts on renal tissues independent of the well known pathways involved in Ca homeostasis. The hormone downregulates P transporters to decrease renal absorption, in addition to downregulating enzymes involved in the conversion of vitamin D. Seminal papers are discussed showing the effects of recombinant FGF23 and FGF23 gene ablation in mice. It is emphasized that applications from understanding the role of FGF23 should lead to strategies for improving the efficiency of P use for skeletal growth and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicDigestive system and related healthFrench-language works237,207