Umbilical cord blood lactate in normal infants: Comparison between two methods of measurement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Firstly, to determine the accuracy of the Radiometer ABL 625 lactate electrode (Radiometer Medical Pty Ltd, Nunawading, Victoria, Australia) by comparing the lactate values obtained by this method to those obtained with the Hitachi 917 lactate analyser (Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada). Secondly, to determine the effect of delay in measurement on blood lactate levels. METHODOLOGY: Umbilical venous (UCV) blood samples were obtained from healthy term infants delivered vaginally. Lactate levels were measured with the Radiometer ABL 625 lactate electrode in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Westmead Hospital and with the Hitachi 917 lactate analyser in 49 paired samples. In addition 26 UCV blood samples were placed in ice slurry and a further 26 samples at room temperature and blood lactate was measured at 5-min intervals for 30 min to determine the change of lactate levels with time. RESULTS: The lactate levels obtained from the Radiometer ABL 625 lactate electrode were consistently lower than the levels obtained from the Hitachi 917 lactate analyser (mean difference - 0.24), but the correlation was high (r = 0.97). The blood lactate levels increased at the rate of 0.012 mmol/L per min if the blood was left at room temperature. The lactate levels remained stable for 20 min if the blood was placed in ice slurry. CONCLUSION: The Radiometer ABL 625 lactate electrode was easy to use and there was high correlation with the values obtained by the standard laboratory method. The blood specimen must be place in an ice slurry if a delay in analysis is anticipated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".