MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980486141 · doi:10.1021/ja805262v

Fragmentation of Fiberlike Structures: Sonication Studies of Cylindrical Block Copolymer Micelles and Behavioral Comparisons to Biological Fibrils

2008· article· en· W1980486141 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicelleChemistrySonicationCopolymerDynamic light scatteringFragmentation (computing)PolymerChemical engineeringPolymer chemistryNanoparticleOrganic chemistryChromatographyAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In alkane solvents, poly(isoprene-b-ferrocenyldimethylsilane) (PI-b-PFS) block copolymer forms fiberlike micelles, which show intriguing similarities with biological fibers such as amyloid fibers. Both systems exhibit fiber growth by a nucleated self-assembly mechanism and rapidly fragment upon exposure to the shear forces of ultrasonic irradiation. Sonication of PI-b-PFS cylindrical micelles was studied quantitatively by static light scattering and by electron microscopy. Both techniques are in excellent agreement and show that the weight-average length of sonicated micelles decreases as a function of sonication time. Simulation of the cleavage of micelles using different scission models shows that micelle fragmentation follows a Gaussian model and that the scission is highly dependent on micelle length, in contrast to DNA and polymer chain scission. We speculate that biological fibers, which are similar in length and rigidity to PFS block copolymer micelles, fragment by a similar mechanism when subjected to sonication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it