MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980518495 · doi:10.1139/o00-007

Activins and their receptors in female reproduction

2000· article· en· W1980518495 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chun Peng, Spencer T. Mukai

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyActivin receptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineParacrine signallingReceptorAutocrine signallingFollistatinFolliculogenesisCell biologyTransforming growth factorEmbryoGeneticsEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activins are growth and differentiation factors belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily. They are dimeric proteins consisting of two inhibin beta subunits. The structure of activins is highly conserved during vertebrate evolution. Activins signal through type I and type II receptor proteins, both of which are serine/threonine kinases. Subsequently, downstream signals such as Smad proteins are phosphorylated. Activins and their receptors are present in many tissues of mammals and lower vertebrates where they function as autocrine and (or) paracrine regulators of a variety of physiological processes, including reproduction. In the hypothalamus, activins are thought to stimulate the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. In the pituitary, activins increase follicle-stimulating hormone secretion and up-regulate gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor expression. In the ovaries of vertebrates, activins are expressed predominantly in the follicular layer of the oocyte where they regulate processes such as folliculogenesis, steroid hormone production, and oocyte maturation. During pregnancy, activin-A is also involved in the regulation of placental functions. This review provides a brief overview of activins and their receptors, including their structures, expression, and functions in the female reproductive axis as well as in the placenta. Special effort is made to compare activins and their receptors in different vertebrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207