MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980524827 · doi:10.1080/14786430500155064

Co-deformation of two-phase Cu–Cr alloys

2005· article· en· W1980524827 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chad W. Sinclair, J.D. Embury, G. C. Weatherly, Key P

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAlloyAtomic unitsWork (physics)Deformation (meteorology)Materials scienceEngineering physicsMetallurgyMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Experiments have been conducted on a model Cu–Cr alloy to investigate the role of fine-scale embedded phases in co-deformation. The results of this work show that, when sufficiently fine, plasticity in embedded phases is accompanied by very large internal stresses. This has been attributed to the difficulty of maintaining compatibility between the phases. A simple model is proposed that is able to capture the essential features of the strengthening in this material under uniaxial tension at low temperatures. Acknowledgements The authors (CWS, JDE and KTC) note with regret the passing of George C. Weatherly on April 29, 2003. George contributed directly and significantly to the work described here and helped prepare the initial draft of this manuscript. The authors would like to acknowledge fruitful discussions with Y. Brechet. JDE and CWS would like to acknowledge NSERC for support of this work. Notes Current address: Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Laboratories, Stn. 63, Chalk River, Canada. Additional informationNotes on contributorsK. T. Conlon Footnote¶ Current address: Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Laboratories, Stn. 63, Chalk River, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied PhysicsSame topicMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesFrench-language works237,207