MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980580268 · doi:10.1117/12.628484

Analysis of gain transients in cascades of discrete fiber Raman amplifiers

2005· article· en· W1980580268 on OpenAlexafffund
Johann Gest, Lawrence R. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCascadeAmplifierOptical amplifierAmplified spontaneous emissionElectronic engineeringLasing thresholdTransient (computer programming)Computer sciencePhysicsEngineeringOpticsLaserCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Discrete fiber Raman amplifiers (DFRAs) are a candidate technology for extending the transmission capacity of dynamic optical networks such as agile all-photonic networks. However, as with conventional doped fiber amplifiers, they suffer from power transients following the addition or removal of channels which results in system penalties due to degradation in optical signal-to-noise-ratio or nonlinear effects. Recently, several groups have investigated all-optical gain-clamping, which consists in introducing a lasing feedback signal in the amplifier, as a means for gain control and mitigating the power transients. In this paper, we theoretically analyse the dynamic response of DFRA cascades in the worst possible case of power transients. In particular, we consider a 64-channel system in which all of the channels except one (i.e. the surviving channel) are cut from and subsequently added to the first amplifier of the cascade. While previous studies have focused on the transient response of the surviving channel when all of the amplifiers in the cascade are either unclamped or gain-clamped, we consider here cascades involving combinations of unclamped and gain-clamped DFRAs. We vary the number and the position of the gain-clamped DFRAs in the cascade to determine whether a cascade in which only a few amplifiers are gain-clamped can be effective for controlling the power transients within tolerable limits. To simulate the dynamic response of the DFRAs, we have developed a new technique, based on a temporal average power analysis. In our simulations, we also take into account the location of the surviving channel and the operational regime of the amplifiers. Our results show that the location of the gain-clamped DFRAs in a mixed cascade is not important when the amplifiers are operated in small-signal regime; on the other hand, as the input signal power is increased, it becomes more preferable to place the gain-clamped amplifiers at the beginning of the cascade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207