MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New insights into the biogenesis of human high-density lipoproteins

2006· review· en· W1980592697 on OpenAlexaff
Larbi Krimbou, Michel Marcil, Jacques Genest

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Lipidology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University
FundersForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
KeywordsABCA1BiogenesisCell biologyBiologyTransporterBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The interest for the human HDL system was recently revived by the identification of the ABCA1 as a critical component in the formation and maintenance of plasma HDL levels. The present review focuses on recent progress in our understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying HDL biogenesis pathways. RECENT FINDINGS: Several novel mechanisms governing ABCA1/apoA-I interactions have recently been identified: apolipoprotein A-I activates ABCA1 phosphorylation through the cAMP/protein kinase A-dependent pathway; the majority of ABCA1 exists as a tetramer in human living cell, supporting the concept that the homotetrameric ABCA1 complex constitutes the minimum functional unit for the formation of nascent HDL particles; apolipoprotein A-I has been shown to have a recycling retroendocytic pathway with uptake and resecretion of the lipidated nascent HDL particles by the cell, most likely through the ABCA1 transporter pathway; there is evidence that the speciation of nascent HDL into pre-beta and alpha-HDL is linked to specific cell lines, and occurs by both ABCA1-dependent and independent pathways. SUMMARY: The fundamental mechanisms underlying the biogenesis, speciation and maturation of HDL remain complex and not well understood. Understanding the mechanisms governing HDL genesis at the cellular level could provide novel insights into the human atheroprotective system in health and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in LipidologySame topicCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismFrench-language works237,207