MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980679309 · doi:10.1094/pdis-94-3-0377a

First Report of Bronze Leaf Disease on Poplar in Alberta, Canada and Sequence of <i>Apioplagiostoma populi</i>

2010· article· en· W1980679309 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. M. Kawchuk, R. J. Howard, Melanie Kalischuk, P. R. Northover, Marie desJardins, R. C. J. Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsShared HealthSaskatchewan Ministry of AgricultureAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyWoody plantWindbreakOrnamental plantBotanyBronzeCanopyHorticultureArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poplar (Populus spp.) is an important ornamental, windbreak, and pulp and wood product tree in Alberta and across western Canada because of its rapid growth, architecture, and hardiness. It is also a major component of native tree stands in the parkland area of the Canadian Prairies. Until recently in North America, infections of Apioplagiostoma populi (Cash & A.M. Waterman) Barr have only been documented in central Canada and the eastern and midwestern United States. Symptoms resembling bronze leaf disease (3) were observed in Alberta as early as 2003 and have been seen each subsequent year on an increasing number of Populus × canescens Smith, P. tremula L., and P. tremuloides Michx. trees from urban areas, shelterbelts, and nurseries. Foliar symptoms were observed in 10 to 50% of the tree canopy, and diseased leaves were bronze-colored with green and yellow petioles and veins. Disease symptoms became pronounced in mid-to-late summer with bronze to dark reddish brown leaves, while the petiole and the midrib remained green. Some symptomatic leaves remained attached to diseased trees throughout the fall and winter and continued the infectious disease cycle in the spring. As the disease advanced, A. populi colonized stem and branch tissues causing the leaves to wilt, discolor, and die shortly afterward. Diseased branches often died within the current season. Continued branch dieback resulted in significantly reduced aesthetic and commercial value. Survival of poplar arising from diseased clones was often less than 5 years. Bronze leaf disease symptoms have been reported on several Populus spp., and premature tree mortality represents a serious impediment to the continued use of this tree species (1). Attempts to isolate the causal agent of bronze leaf disease on artificial media have been unsuccessful (4). In the fall of 2008, leaves from symptomatic trees were collected and suspended outdoors in mesh bags to overwinter. Dark brown perithecia (150 to 200 × 100 to 150 μm) emerged the following spring from the lower and upper leaf surfaces. Asci were fusoid clavate, 30 to 40 × 10 to 14 μm with a conspicuous apical ring and contained hyaline two-celled ascospores 10 to 14 × 3 to 6 μm that were ellipsoid clavate with a relatively short basal cell. Nucleic acid was extracted from isolated perithecia and amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and oligonucleotides 5'GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC3' and 5'TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC3' specific for rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence (2). The cloned amplified sequence of the A. populi rDNA ITS region (GenBank Accession No. GU205341) showed considerable homology (>90% identity) to other Apioplagiostoma spp. In total, 33 independent leaf samples from nine trees exhibiting disease symptoms were positive for A. populi, producing an approximately 300-bp sequence not observed in any of the symptomless samples. Poplar and aspen have been extensively planted in rural and urban landscapes in western Canada over the past 100 years and continued spread of the bronze leaf disease pathogen threatens the viability of the shelterbelt, nursery, and processed wood industries. References: (1) E. K. Cash and A. M. Waterman. Mycologia 49:756, 1957. (2) A. H. Khadhair et al. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 20:55, 1998. (3) P. R. Northover and M. Desjardins. Plant Dis. 87:1538, 2003. (4) J. A. Smith et al. Plant Dis. 86:462, 2002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207